If You Wanted Confirmationour...
News2 mins ago
Churches To Close And Become Refugee Centres With Immediate Effect.
37 Answers
Well, it's what Jesus would want, innit.
https:/
Another barking mad cloud chatter.
https:/
Another barking mad cloud chatter.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by douglas9401. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Naomi. I think that Jesus wasn't nice to his family. But he did say some things that went against the grain of following the strict religious rules of the time. But none of that made later christians more charitable. They did burn people at the stake etc and so on. I don't think that J advocated that sort of thing.
I don't try to speak for Jesus, but I'm fairly sure that He would not speak in the words of the Arch.B. of C.. He was clear sighted.
Re: OP. Arch-B. Welby - I resigned once from our P.C.C. over his endorsement of lockdown and closing churches. I thought he was wrong. I returned a few months ago, having decided that I cared more about my 'patch' than about distant ramblings. I am happy to tell anyone, including our vicar, that I think Welby, for all his good qualities, is simply well out of touch. He is hurting local churches, people have already spoken to me about it and I can't defend him. I think he's wrong, but shall ignore him on this.
Probably because I had a Methodist mother, but I don't have total faith in the pronunciations of Bishops and Archbishops. I do care about our local church and its people and the good we can do together.
Re: OP. Arch-B. Welby - I resigned once from our P.C.C. over his endorsement of lockdown and closing churches. I thought he was wrong. I returned a few months ago, having decided that I cared more about my 'patch' than about distant ramblings. I am happy to tell anyone, including our vicar, that I think Welby, for all his good qualities, is simply well out of touch. He is hurting local churches, people have already spoken to me about it and I can't defend him. I think he's wrong, but shall ignore him on this.
Probably because I had a Methodist mother, but I don't have total faith in the pronunciations of Bishops and Archbishops. I do care about our local church and its people and the good we can do together.
The republic of Ireland, under the very expensive EU dictatorship, have had to allow 1000's of African male migrants to its population, all over.
Mainly local women protest, they ask their Gov' where will they be housed and why are they told they will get houses above the 12,000 homeless Irish people, the weak Gov just calls them far-right. The weak left media only interview well-off rich people but refuse to answer the simple question of the ordinary residents.
As the old saying goes, don't mess with the (very attractive) Irish girls.
Mainly local women protest, they ask their Gov' where will they be housed and why are they told they will get houses above the 12,000 homeless Irish people, the weak Gov just calls them far-right. The weak left media only interview well-off rich people but refuse to answer the simple question of the ordinary residents.
As the old saying goes, don't mess with the (very attractive) Irish girls.
//We have the deterrent - immediate removal to Rwanda.//
No really. If it ever gets off the ground (a very big “if”) the scheme has the capacity for 1,000 people. In the six months ending December 31st 2022 there were 33,000 “small boat” arrivals - a rate that is set to be exceeded this year. So the Rwanda scheme will cater for about five or six days arrivals (not counting, of course, the number that will be offset by the UK’s agreement to take “a number” (unspecified) of Rwanda’s “most vulnerable” refugees.
So even if this scheme gets going, it will quickly be filled and the chances of anybody being deported to Rwanda will soon become minimal.
No really. If it ever gets off the ground (a very big “if”) the scheme has the capacity for 1,000 people. In the six months ending December 31st 2022 there were 33,000 “small boat” arrivals - a rate that is set to be exceeded this year. So the Rwanda scheme will cater for about five or six days arrivals (not counting, of course, the number that will be offset by the UK’s agreement to take “a number” (unspecified) of Rwanda’s “most vulnerable” refugees.
So even if this scheme gets going, it will quickly be filled and the chances of anybody being deported to Rwanda will soon become minimal.
NJ, Rwanda is seen as a deterrent. Is custodial sentencing not a deterrent to criminal activity? Would removing the deterrent not lead to an increase in crime?
The Australians virtually stopped all illegal immigrants in boats by publicising the fact that it was useless trying, because they would be immediately deported & those that did try, were.
The Australians virtually stopped all illegal immigrants in boats by publicising the fact that it was useless trying, because they would be immediately deported & those that did try, were.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.