ChatterBank0 min ago
Why Is Nadine Dorres Conducting An Enquiry Into Her Peerage Being Refused.
While she is a serving MP as she has backtracked he resignation, her responsibility is to serving her constituents, not conducting enquiries into why she didn't get a peerage, all at the taxpayers expense as she his not devoting her time to her paid job. Can she be forced to resign?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by barney15c. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.She can do her own enquiries, there is no reason for taxpayers' money to pay. Anyway, the Torygraph explained it very clearly for her:
> https:/ /www.te legraph .co.uk/ politic s/2023/ 06/09/n adine-d orries- no-peer age-bor is-john son-res ignatio n-honou rs/
The Telegraph understands from senior government sources that Mr Johnson had put the names of Mr Adams, Ms Dorries, Mr Sharma and Mr Jack to Holac.
However, the body ruled they could not be given peerages because they were outside the normal time limit of six months before a general election.
This was because any vetting carried out now would be deemed to be out of date by the time of the next election in 18 months time.
A note from Lord Bew, the Holac chairman, was submitted to this effect to 10 Downing Street, The Telegraph can disclose.
The ruling meant that the four names were not on the list which was given to Mr Sunak a week ago. It was left then for Mr Sunak to clear the remaining names on the list.
... this position was explained to Ms Dorries at length on Friday ...
> https:/
The Telegraph understands from senior government sources that Mr Johnson had put the names of Mr Adams, Ms Dorries, Mr Sharma and Mr Jack to Holac.
However, the body ruled they could not be given peerages because they were outside the normal time limit of six months before a general election.
This was because any vetting carried out now would be deemed to be out of date by the time of the next election in 18 months time.
A note from Lord Bew, the Holac chairman, was submitted to this effect to 10 Downing Street, The Telegraph can disclose.
The ruling meant that the four names were not on the list which was given to Mr Sunak a week ago. It was left then for Mr Sunak to clear the remaining names on the list.
... this position was explained to Ms Dorries at length on Friday ...
You do have a point.
She and Boris had a plan but Sunak scuppered it.
Now she is trying to engineer a by election in her own constituency, at a time that will be the most embarrassing and damaging to Rishi Sunak.
She is not a true Conservative, she belongs to a cult, and has no idea what she is doing.
Get back to your inferior Mills & Boon jottings asap.
She and Boris had a plan but Sunak scuppered it.
Now she is trying to engineer a by election in her own constituency, at a time that will be the most embarrassing and damaging to Rishi Sunak.
She is not a true Conservative, she belongs to a cult, and has no idea what she is doing.
Get back to your inferior Mills & Boon jottings asap.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.