//And therefore the extension of the ULEZ scheme can be fairly laid at the feet of the Tory central government.//
Do you have any evidence for that?
Among the conditions for the £1bn TfL bailout were that the Mayor must find new revenue streams to help stabilise TfL’s finances. But as far as I know (and I do take a keen interest in London’s transport affairs) there was no specific instruction to expand ULEZ. It has always been well known - long before the pandemic - that Mayor Khan was keen on the idea and it is no secret that his long term plan is to introduce payment per mile (or per minute) for driving in London (which extends well into the surrounding countryside and farmland). Quite simply, he is against private motoring in the Capital.
Don’t you think, especially as the ULEZ issue looks likely to be a major factor in determining how the people of London vote in the next Mayoral election (in which Mayor Khan intends to stand) that if your contention was correct, he would have made it known and produced evidence for it by now? He would know that the last Labour Mayor (Ken Livingstone) was deposed mainly by the votes of those in Outer London (which ULEZ mainly affects).
Of course no bailout at all would have been required had the ridiculous Covid restrictions not been enacted which largely crippled London’s economy and continue to do so (and which were supported by all parties, and which were suggested as being too lenient by Labour). But that’s another argument. Meanwhile, have you any evidence (other than some bloke on YouTube) to support your claim?