ChatterBank2 mins ago
What Does "Released Under Investigation" Entail ?
Surely, once arrested, it's unwise to let him go.
https:/ /uk.yah oo.com/ news/ma n-dies- being-s prayed- ammonia -150216 058.htm l
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.oh, it means I see in google
When you are released under investigation, you won't be given any conditions, and you do not have to report back to the police station at an agreed date and time. However, you should be weary of contacting anyone linked to your case as this could be deemed witness intimidation and/or perverting the course of justice.13 Feb 2023.
I thought it was more: we will be watching you and visiting you soon again probably
When you are released under investigation, you won't be given any conditions, and you do not have to report back to the police station at an agreed date and time. However, you should be weary of contacting anyone linked to your case as this could be deemed witness intimidation and/or perverting the course of justice.13 Feb 2023.
I thought it was more: we will be watching you and visiting you soon again probably
In order to prevent loads of perfectly innocent people being locked up, the law gives all suspected offenders the right to bail unless there are specific reasons for bail not to be granted. (e.g. bail can be refused when there would appear to be a likelihood that the suspect will flee the country, when it's thought possible that he might carry out other offences or when he might seek to interfere with witnesses). So the vast majority of suspects in criminal investigations are given bail (or 'released under investigation' as below).
Some time ago though, there were concerns that many suspects were being given loads of restrictive bail conditions and that they were then constantly being re-bailed, meaning that their lives could be disrupting for many months or even years before a decision as to whether to proceed with any criminal charges was made. (Innocent people were losing their livelihoods and, if their businesses went bust because of the bail conditions, their employees would suffer too).
So the police are now only allowed to bail suspects for a fairly short period of time. As an alternative, they can now 'release a suspect under investigation', meaning that they can be required to attend a police station at an unspecified date but they can't be made the subject of any bail conditions.
Some time ago though, there were concerns that many suspects were being given loads of restrictive bail conditions and that they were then constantly being re-bailed, meaning that their lives could be disrupting for many months or even years before a decision as to whether to proceed with any criminal charges was made. (Innocent people were losing their livelihoods and, if their businesses went bust because of the bail conditions, their employees would suffer too).
So the police are now only allowed to bail suspects for a fairly short period of time. As an alternative, they can now 'release a suspect under investigation', meaning that they can be required to attend a police station at an unspecified date but they can't be made the subject of any bail conditions.
new Bail Act said that most people are bailed
( but that doesnt answer the question)
Lord Very Important was bailed for two or three years ( in relation to the Cliff non-case), and so HE was able to stir up the ministers to change things.
co-worker, 1985 was charged wiv GBH ( defence of self defence worked so well the Judge didnt hear the case. [" this defence succeeds"] and he was remanded in custody Walton Jail for 60 d before - - - the whole definitive case was heard and he was acquitted ! - now it is more like one to two years
( but that doesnt answer the question)
Lord Very Important was bailed for two or three years ( in relation to the Cliff non-case), and so HE was able to stir up the ministers to change things.
co-worker, 1985 was charged wiv GBH ( defence of self defence worked so well the Judge didnt hear the case. [" this defence succeeds"] and he was remanded in custody Walton Jail for 60 d before - - - the whole definitive case was heard and he was acquitted ! - now it is more like one to two years
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.