Shopping & Style2 mins ago
Galaxy Chocolate Insult
The Galaxy bar has changed recently from 110g to 100g but remains the same price. Mars Confectionery were citing increased costs and overheads etc to justify the price increase. This is an insult from a company that is amongst the top 5 wealthiest companies on the planet. Everything they make in the confectionery side of the business is pure profit and is subsidised by the Mars bar, which itself makes 1/2p profit on every sale. But this is what companies do now, isn't it? Take the mick out of everyone with these excuses. This is a private company and has never had shareholders. The greed and the insults don't surprise me in the slightest.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by 10ClarionSt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Thanks for the replies folks.
THECORBYLOON @ 20.18:
"If everything, "in the confectionery side of the business is pure profit", why would those products need a subsidy from the sales of Mars bars?"
It's pure profit because of the Mars bar. All the profit form the sale of Mars bars pays for the rest of the products, then, still makes 1/2p profit per bar after that. It's the Mars bar wot duz it, TCL.
The Mars Bar is always vying to be the top selling chocolate bar in the world, along with 2 other brands, i.e. Kit-Kat and the Hershey Bar.
It's still an insult.
There are some things my wife used to enjoy but will no longer buy because they have passed the price point that she is prepared to pay. 'I'm not paying that much!' I doubt she is alone with this attitude.
They are also aware of the competition, the own brand knock offs. If the price difference becomes too great they will lose even more sales to supermarket own brands.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.