Home & Garden25 mins ago
Brown / Blunkett.
5 Answers
http://news.aol.co.uk/brown-faced-sack-over-ir aq/article/20061011033109990001?CLI=16009117
Blunkett wrote in his diary that Brown sided with Blair in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in fear of his job, is it any suprise to anyone? The only one in the cabinet with any backbone at the start of hostilities was Robin Cook.
If it`s true about Brown being under the thumb and thinking more for his job than for the lives of thousands in the conflict, then would we want him as the next Premier?
That`s if it`s true.
Blunkett wrote in his diary that Brown sided with Blair in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in fear of his job, is it any suprise to anyone? The only one in the cabinet with any backbone at the start of hostilities was Robin Cook.
If it`s true about Brown being under the thumb and thinking more for his job than for the lives of thousands in the conflict, then would we want him as the next Premier?
That`s if it`s true.
Answers
1 to 5 of 5
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bustergutt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Probably more complicated than that.
If Brown had sided with Cook, it would have probably broght Blair down if not the entire government.
That would have presented Brown with a very difficult choice - back the war or bring down the government and be seen as the man who did so.
A number of people would have seen it as a deliberate action to further his own ambitions which might well have killed his own career.
Shame Robin Cook died though he would have been the only realistic challenger to Brown - Labour does have a habit of seeing it's best die early
If Brown had sided with Cook, it would have probably broght Blair down if not the entire government.
That would have presented Brown with a very difficult choice - back the war or bring down the government and be seen as the man who did so.
A number of people would have seen it as a deliberate action to further his own ambitions which might well have killed his own career.
Shame Robin Cook died though he would have been the only realistic challenger to Brown - Labour does have a habit of seeing it's best die early
another possibility:
Blair is on his way out, Brown probably on his way in.
Blunkett wants a job.
Blunkett publishes a book saying Brown was against the war. This encourages Labour voters who also oppose the war to think Brown is a Good Thing.
As a result of this, Brown gets the top job.
Blunkett gets back into cabinet.
I may be too cynical here, but it is worth considering the timing of Blunkett's book.
As for Brown being under Blair's thumb - well, that's his job. Any prime minister is the leader of his country and while other ministers may oppose him in private, they must weigh the consequences of making their disagreement public, as jake says.
Blair is on his way out, Brown probably on his way in.
Blunkett wants a job.
Blunkett publishes a book saying Brown was against the war. This encourages Labour voters who also oppose the war to think Brown is a Good Thing.
As a result of this, Brown gets the top job.
Blunkett gets back into cabinet.
I may be too cynical here, but it is worth considering the timing of Blunkett's book.
As for Brown being under Blair's thumb - well, that's his job. Any prime minister is the leader of his country and while other ministers may oppose him in private, they must weigh the consequences of making their disagreement public, as jake says.
1 to 5 of 5
Latest Posts
ChatterBank40 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles68 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles141 mins ago
Are We Heading Towards Another...
Politics141 mins ago
ChatterBank146 mins ago
