Editor's Blog1 min ago
Post Office - Disclosure And Chief Investigator Crucified
There is a stream near ch 231 carrying only the Post Office Tribunal. Steve Bradshaw in the chair and also Records Officer in certain cases.
He had put his signature to a letter dictated by the lawyers usually denying disclosure since there was no problem
and taken thro a whole load emails about the problems with Horizon that he KNEW about
oo-er M'lud !
Is anyone else watching ?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Peter Pedant. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.yerss - and also the judge might warn the witness at the time ( which didnt occur ) - and I thought he ( Wyn W - judgie baby) was gonna say -" and that is our 5th amendment." He didnt. The common law rule predates the 5 th amendment and um er is the reason why the Americans inserted it ( they forgot) 1789 or whenever
instead he intoned - the common law rule against self-incrimination
and today - - I thought was Gareth jenkins, "why I said a crap program wasnt..." but may instead by - why the post office failed to hand over documents. (70m of them)
BUT watch that channel !
covert recordings may also be produced showing P.O. knew much sooner ( like 10 y sooner). today only
I have laid in supplies of pop corn.
Steve Bradshaw ( yesterday) was delayed from Nov 23 on account of... non production of documents
the archived strean is here
https:/
Steve Bradshaw was 11 Jan after a paper dump of 4000 pages which had to be read overnight Nov 23- they werent
this was after Lisa Allen who was slaughtered
Prior to this, an email dump of 365 000 emails were found
Chris Jackson was summoned to explain what the hell was going on in the PO IT dept
PP, I just posted this link on another story - Alan Bates arguing in the FT that crowdfunding legal cases like that of the postmasters may now be illegal
https:/
- sorry if it's inaccessible
P O Management really thought that over 100 postmasters had suddenly decided to turn to crime.
no I previously thought that there was a lot out there and Hoeizon was nailing it for once
BUT from Allen and Bradshaw, they held Horizon to be infallible ( even in the obvious evidence that it wasnt) and so any shortfall was fraud / false accounting
BUT after hours of popcorn
there is a record of the helpline telling them to make entries to balance it oo-er !
AND there were audit trails which WOULD have acquitted the defendant which they P.O. knew, and never activated ( what?)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.