ChatterBank11 mins ago
Should There Be Instant Road Side Bans For Drink/Drug Drivers?
Good idea and include mobile phone users too.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I know I started it but 'due process' seems to mean something a bit different to what non-legal types like you and me may think.
This seems to be a further weakening of the rights of citizens in favour of bring down the workloads of police and courts.
https:/
"An American constitutional lawyer might well be surprised by the elusiveness of references to the term 'due process of law' in the general body of English legal writing.... Today one finds no space devoted to due process in Halsbury's Laws of England, in Stephen's Commentaries, or Anson's Law and Custom of the Constitution. The phrase rates no entry in such works as Stroud's Judicial Dictionary or Wharton's Law Lexicon.[1]"
Perhaps the term "Roadside ban" is misleading; if the offender is given the calibrated tests at a Police Station before the ban is issued then I would give more support to the idea. Maybe even a reading over 100 (say) required before a police ban could be given,readings below that figure being treated as they are now.
doesn't even have to be the police these days
https:/
// Yes barry, that's possible but we can't not enact change because it's possible that errors will be made. //
Oh please can we introduce capitol punishment in that case. Apparently DNA is foolproof. I'll pull the trap and answer to my maker.. Oooops. Perhaps that is why I am exempt for jury service.🤣
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.