Zenleaf Cbd Gummies (Website Alert!)...
Spam & Scams9 mins ago
So what difference will sanctioning do? As far as i know she doesnt hold any job positions of any description anymore, shut the door after the old nag has bolted.
No best answer has yet been selected by barney15c. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.There are only a few remedies available to us in English Law, these days.
We are no longer allowed to remove body-parts to 'satisfy' the victim. So we are left with the deprivation of money or liberty.
No amount of money could satisfy the amount of harm over which PV presided. She was top of the heap and was rewarded well for being there......right at the top, where the buck stops.
So, I think depriving her of her liberty together with every man-jack of the others who heard, saw and did nothing, or didn't hear or see but should have done, if really the only thing left.
The viddies of the oral testimony are compelling
Alan Bates ( innocente) has already been told in evidence about a meeting he attended ( 'cant remember!' even the most articulate of the SPMs did NOT keep a calendar and record of events !!) and then - we have a secret recording of the meeting
( then why ask him, if you know what it was about?)
so .... second sight APPEAR to have recorded the tele meetings and disclosed them to the inquiry ! ! !
the others who heard, saw and did nothing,
ay hev been in this situation - -" he cant have done this, no one would do this!" - accusing my employer of perjury, knowing that if I were wrong.... I wd get fired.
He had, I didnt get fired and we went on with our lives. Judgie baby: " I am so very wise, that I can ignore the disputed evidence and he's ( third man) is STILL guilty" - phew well thank god for that
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.