News7 mins ago
Interesting Snooker Situation.......
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.That's the point it was not treated as an in off, it did not enter the pocket, Dott pushed it back with his hand. The ref called foul and Selby should have played it from where it stopped, instead he assumed the in off was given and picked the cue ball up and put it in the D. The ref called foul on Selby, Selby looked puzzled. Selby should have either played it from where it ended up after the Dott push or put Dott back in.
did you see Dott put his fist in and stop the ball entering the pocket at the start? The fact that the ball did not enter the pocket means that it's not an in off but it is a foul because Dott touched the cue ball. So Selby should have eaither played it from where it stopped or put Dott back in. Instead he believed that it was an in off and picked the ball up and thus fouled also.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.