Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by SparklyKid. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Photo, too  many extraneous objects, Which an artist would omit.

It's a painting by Russell Howarth.

 I'm surprised. Howarth's style is usually much more open and loose in his interpretation.

Question Author

not convinced, too much intricate detail

Not convinced it's a painting or not convinced it's by that artist?

It's a painting.

The link by Etch shows it is a painting by Howarth but the reason I was surprised is although it's quite a small picture, 18 x 15, even the road sign writing is perfectly clear as in a photograph. 

Here are other examples of his work, the intricate work shown in this picture isn't there in the other work shown.

http://countygalleries.co.uk/artists/russell-howarth/

-- answer removed --

I've never seen the point of photo-realism other than, "look how clever I am."?

Good painting (a broad term) has to be about something.  

That price includes the commission.

It's painted but I wouldnt call it a painting.

But of course art is subjective.

Corby : //What is this $48.8 million painting about?//

Objectively, it's about international money laundering. Subjectively, it's about colour.

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Photo Or Oil Painting?

Answer Question >>