Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

The problem is 3T,who are they planning to replace him with?...another non-charismatic ,old age pensioner hating a**-hole?

They're all vile and clueless so it won't change anything. 

If any of that lot think they can rescue the situation it shows just how unsuitable they are for their positions.

Maybe we just treat the whole thing as a long enema and we'll feel much better when it's run its course.

Douglas Adams had it about right - 

 

“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.

To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

Angela raynor as PM? What an embarrassment she would be!

I forecast before the election that if Labour got in Starmer would have 2 years max before the looney left threw him out  and replaced him with a commie.

@1603 no more 'vile' than the previous crew!

^oh I think they are.

You are of course entitled to your opinion as am I.

^^^ so much for stating the bleedin' obvious!

Of course ... but there's no denying that the previous crew didn't do what this lot have done -  and will do.  They have this country is well and truly stuffed.

Starmer is proving to be more of a liability than an asset  - there are many better alternatives but the policies won't change.

They have four and a half years to steady the ship of state.

Don't fret, we're heading towards calm seas and blue skies.

All will be good and all manner of things will be good.

Sarcasm at its finest sandy.Only trouble is is no one is laughing.

I am.

The Cons dumped 5 PMs and 7 Chancellors in their last Govt before the Great British public dumped the Cons ,and elected Labour with a huge Majority..lol 🤣😃😁😏.With such a huge majority  The Cons are now silenced 🤭🤭 and on the back burner🤭lol.

//The Cons dumped 5 PMs and 7 Chancellors in their last Govt// 

If you mean 2010-2024: for PMs  there's  Cameron, May,  Johnson, Truss. Who was the other? Are you counting Sunak who stepped down and was replaced after they were in government.

for Chancellors: Osborne, Hammond, Javid, Sunak, Zahawi, Kwarteng (and maybe you're counting Hunt) who stayed until they left government, so that's 6 or 7 I can think of, not 10.

Have you miscounted? Accidentally of course. Or is it just exaggeration for effect?

Sorry 6 not 7 (not 10)

Appropos - I've just read that that song 'Freezing this Christmas' is now No. 2 in the charts (not that I follow them) and in line to be the Christmas No. 1 - despite major broadcasters refusing to play it.  I've not heard it, but it must be rather embarrassing for Sir K..

Why would that be embarrassing for Sir Keir? No one is freezing. 
I don't agree with much of what this government has done so far, despite my being a Labour supporter, but no one is freezing to death. 

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Are Labour Preparing To Dump The P M ?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.