ChatterBank1 min ago
Credit Where It's Due.....
While you are at it, abolish the whole show and replace with an elected upper house.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It's the Bash Street Kids v. Lord Snooty - that's about the level of these clowns.
Hereditary peers are a part of the British way of life, do no harm at all, bring a unique perspective to government, and are more than counter-balanced by hundreds of nominated peers of all stripes.
But they're all 'toffs' - and well educated ones too - so they must go.
What a pathetic, vindictive government Britain now has.
Jess Phillips, Angela Rayner, Lammy, Starmer, Reeves & Cooper etc. , I wouldn't want them as my parish councillors let alone running the country.
Hereditary peers are capable of doing a great deal of harm, khandro. The unelected shouldn't be there at all. This initiative, implemented by crafty design is intended solely to create a second house stuffed with Labour cronies, it will do nothing to remedy that - and that is the intention. With the rumoured introduction of voting for 16 year olds I fear that this government is intent on creating a system that imposes their flavour of politics on this country permanently.
n. //Hereditary peers are capable of doing a great deal of harm, khandro.//
To whom & how ?
Former Conservative Government advisor; James Price opines;
Speaking as an openly arriviste, state schoolboy with a chip on his shoulder, it pains me to say that the hereditary peers were, almost without exception, more hard-working, dedicated and serious about their constitutional role than anyone else I’ve ever dealt with in politics. And I say this as someone who was the Special Adviser to the Leader of the House of Lords through Getting Brexit Done and the early Covid drama.