Just a note to Lankeela, if you're refering to me with your last comment then I'd at least like to point out exactly where I stand. Firstly, there are many things regarding animal activists such as the PETA which I strongly dissagree with. I'm no idiot myself and am fully capable of making my own, well informed and thought out decisions and opinions, as I believe are just about all the other people who have contributed to this debate, yourself included. Thus I am not the kind of person who would metaphorically take anything 'hook, line and sinker', at least not easily. Furthermore it strikes me that you object to extremism in the sense of a deviation from existing social values. Why you are so angry at what has been said I fail to understand, as I feel I am yet to genuinely observe any such extremism here (we're not planning a Nazi takeover!). Activists are not necessarily extremists, myself included! (Though I won't argue with the whole being a nutter thing.)
On a slightly different note though, if it's any consolation regarding saanen's last comment, I personally do not agree with it and feel it was unneccessarily harsh. In my opinion your statement was clearly thought out as most people are either ignorant or opposed to what the activists stand for. These are therefore the people who activists should not try to alienate themselves from. After all, if they did then it's little better than Nazi fascism. To be successful they need to continually bear the needs of the people in mind, as well as those of the animals etc. otherwise they only spawn distain from the public, which is admittedly what has happened to a great many of these organisastions in the past, possibly explaining why you feel their actions are more akin to brainwashing than helping a moral public to decide what's right through use of education. They must win the support of the masses, rather than try to force them to see things the way they do.