Thank You Starmer Reeves And Raynor
ChatterBank0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by veritysims. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.(1) The claim of 98% accuracy is probably grossly exaggerated.
(2) 98% is not certain enough to justify a conviction.
"Lie detector tests" do not detect lies; they measure and detect variations in skin temperature, conductivity, heart-rate, sweat and so on. In other words, they measure the physical things which tend to happen to the body when someone lies.
It is possible for someone who is an experienced criminal to train him/herself to lie without giving it away;
similarly it is likely that someone who is nervous would give the same responses even if he/she is only afraid that he/she will be thought to be lying.
Just to get you into the mood, and be a more obvious "liar" on the machine, operators often announce in hallowed and authoritative tones that the polygraph is infallible or 99% true. This subject believes the twaddle and becomes even more nervous when telling the lie.
I t's just a bit of showmanship aimed at moulding the mind of the subject to make up for the aproximation of the whole process.