Shopping & Style2 mins ago
Notice of Severance of Equitable Joint Tenancy
3 Answers
My ex-husband is terminally ill and stll lives in the property we bought in 1991. He was supposed to be doing up the house and putting it on the market but because of his illness has been unable to do so. I have received a letter from his solicitor asking me to sign a form agreeing to the above. He has amassed a lot of debts on the property since I moved out five years ago (he was unfaithful but would not leave so my son and I did) and the last thing I want to do is be left with all of his debts after he has gone - I cannot afford this. Will this severance make any difference to this? If not what can I do to ensure that I do not end up being liable after his death? The lender will not let him have the mortgage in his own rights as he has arrears. They did indicate to me if he was arrears free for three months they would then be able to take my name of the property but would need to check this with them again.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Valrie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'd take advice on this but I think it may be to your advantage to sever the tenancy.
This means that half the house is yours and that his creditors cannot take more than the half that is his.
What I can't work out is why he is doing it - unless he has pangs of conscience and is wanting to see you are OK. There could be something I haven't thought of though.
You will not be liable for any debts after his death unless they are joint debts.
This means that half the house is yours and that his creditors cannot take more than the half that is his.
What I can't work out is why he is doing it - unless he has pangs of conscience and is wanting to see you are OK. There could be something I haven't thought of though.
You will not be liable for any debts after his death unless they are joint debts.
You say he has run up debts on the property. Are you sure they are secured on it - i.e. that charging orders have been obtained by the creditors? (I assume none of them result from documents you signed agreeing to the debt being secured.) If he has got debts secured without your signature and without charging orders, then I think he may have done something he shouldn't have done, such as getting your signature forged or some other fraud. If the secured debts are in both your names then payment to the creditors (unless it can be proved he has committed fraud) would come out of both your shares in the house. If debts in his sole name have been secured by charging order then they can only come out of his share - whether it is a joint tenancy or not.
If the house is a joint tenancy it becomes yours on his death; if the joint tenancy is severed it becomes a tenancy in common, the % owned by each party is specified in the documents & each can leave their part to whoever they like in their will. With joint tenancy you would normally be entitled to 50% of the equity so you should make sure that - if you do sign the form - you will remain entitled to at least 50%.
Whichever type of tenancy it is, I think (but am not certain) that all the secured debts have to be paid before the equity can be released. (The exception would be if the charging order debts exceede the value of his share.) If this is the case, it could be that the secured debts are less than 50% of the equity and that he is efffectively trying to do you out of something. For example house value �100K; debts �40K. With joint tenancy you would end up with �60K. With tenancy in common at 50% (assuming he leaves his share to someone else) you end up with �50K of the value less �20K of the debts - �30K.
I am not sure about the above, but you ought to get it checked out.
If the house is a joint tenancy it becomes yours on his death; if the joint tenancy is severed it becomes a tenancy in common, the % owned by each party is specified in the documents & each can leave their part to whoever they like in their will. With joint tenancy you would normally be entitled to 50% of the equity so you should make sure that - if you do sign the form - you will remain entitled to at least 50%.
Whichever type of tenancy it is, I think (but am not certain) that all the secured debts have to be paid before the equity can be released. (The exception would be if the charging order debts exceede the value of his share.) If this is the case, it could be that the secured debts are less than 50% of the equity and that he is efffectively trying to do you out of something. For example house value �100K; debts �40K. With joint tenancy you would end up with �60K. With tenancy in common at 50% (assuming he leaves his share to someone else) you end up with �50K of the value less �20K of the debts - �30K.
I am not sure about the above, but you ought to get it checked out.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.