News2 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.We are talking about unimagineable numbers of stars - aren't we ?
Also unimagineable , is the size of the universe , given that there is huge distances between the stars in our galaxy alone - never mind between galaxies - yes ?
Loosehead - according to the link below from dawkins , there appears to be a few more stars in our galaxy than you have stated - which figure is correct ?
mibn2cweus - Given the number of stars out there , there must be one at least with a planet , that has intelligent life - would you agree ?
Another thing that I have always wondered , is why is it that astronomers always appear to assume that if there is life on other planets , it would have evolved with the same physiology as humans .
Surely it is possible that other life forms might have evolved in enviroments that would be lethal to humans ?
Also unimagineable , is the size of the universe , given that there is huge distances between the stars in our galaxy alone - never mind between galaxies - yes ?
Loosehead - according to the link below from dawkins , there appears to be a few more stars in our galaxy than you have stated - which figure is correct ?
mibn2cweus - Given the number of stars out there , there must be one at least with a planet , that has intelligent life - would you agree ?
Another thing that I have always wondered , is why is it that astronomers always appear to assume that if there is life on other planets , it would have evolved with the same physiology as humans .
Surely it is possible that other life forms might have evolved in enviroments that would be lethal to humans ?