Donate SIGN UP

Nuclear power

Avatar Image
frogstar | 11:22 Wed 23rd May 2007 | News
6 Answers
If the nuclear power facilities weren't renewed, would that mean an end to the UK's nuclear deterrent, or are they different things?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by frogstar. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
They are different things, although weapons grade plutonium and Uranium are residue from power generation, other than that one is not dependant on the other.
They are entirely different things.
-- answer removed --
In the 1950s weapons-grade plutoniun was scarce and nuclear power stations such as Windscale produced it as a by-product. The world is now awash with weapons-grade plutonium (for use as triggers in thermonuclear warheads) and the building of new nuclear power stations wouldn't be a factor.
As they process weapons grade plutonium from nuclear power stations and there is a world wide shortage of uranium is this the reason for wanting to build more of them to satisfy our future needs? This government has made me cynical!
I suppose we could tell the Iranians 'Any funny business and we'll drop Sellafield on you'.

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Nuclear power

Answer Question >>