Hi Panda,
Unfortunately Norman is a grouchy old thing who is probably refering to the number of postings in which it is stated that the person concerned wouldn't harm a fly ordinarily, has put their hands up to the charge despite being 'innocent' and then other ABers being asked to second-guess the outcome of the case.
I'm not sure anyone can help you, really, as there will be more evidence, i.e statements,etc. than you are able to offer.
If the circumstances are as you have described then we can all only trust to the sense of the Court and hope your fella receives the correct outcome.