Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Animal cruelty
Here's a controversial one (which I raise for the purposes of discussion and not because I necessarily agree with it). Given that it seems to be agreed that animals on their way to, and also in, the slaughterhouse suffer distress and pain and given that human beings don't have to eat meat (since there are plenty of healthy alternatives) then the only difference between fox-hunting and meat-eating is a matter of degree (since both take place for the purpose of giving humans pleasure). And, if this is true, then the majority of those opposed to fox-hunting (who, presumably, are meat-eaters) are simply being hypocritical.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Brugel. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.theres realy no excuse for eating meat,theres plenty of other options.it seems to me that meat eaters have to attack veggies to justify there own guilt.its just pure greed.well there is now over 7million vegetarians in this country and growing by the day.quorn alone is outselling some types of meat.