valid points from both, voter apathy seems even more prevelant than it has in recent elections, as I said yesterday on AOG's post, up until the early 90's there was an imperial mile between the policies of Labour and the Conservatives, you knew where you stood, now the policies are so close you couldn't pass a razer blade between them
Personnelly I think we should have a general election because this country voted for a Tony Blair labour govenment and not Gordon Brown labour govenment.
However Gordon Brown as waited so long to be Prime minister, I think he will wait untill he feels confident that he as a clear lead over the tories and its always a risk having a general election in autumn and winter time because people might be put off voting because of the weather.
Hmmm, i dont know where they get these figures from.
Labour will win again no matter when they hold the election.
It was just like in America, when they said Bush would have no chance, yet he won.
I was right on that too...
I trhink Brown will call it. Cameron is a lame duck, and the Tories as of now can not win an election. Waiting a couple of years can only favour the Tories. And even though matty1 above is wrong about voting for a Blair Government not a Brown one, Brown winning an election will put a stop to such comments.
Hi John,
Yes, if Brown has any chance of winning its now, he's stoked up election fever, and if he doesn't call it now, people are going to wonder what he's made of.
Lets face it, the mans got no guts anyway, ten years as Bliars No2, and in all that time, in case it jeopardised his chances of becoming PM, never stood up to Bliar once.
Gordon Brown would not necessarily be wise to call an election as he may not win. But why shoudl he be allowed to be prime minister by default - there should be an election so that the people of Britain can choose who they want as prime minister. Seems like labour are becoming dictators and not allowing for a democratic choice by the people