Just recently the Telegraph slipped through a 14% increase from 70p to 80p without so much as a murmour of objection. Maybe other papers did too, I wouldn't know.
How can they justify this when a goodly proportion of their output is supplements which go straight in the bin unread?
Simple answer, Dont buy it, I have'nt bought a newspaper for about 3 years now, everything you need can be found on the internet, majority of what you read is made up anyway.
Hmmm, i heard the increase was due to the recent post strikes.
They have had to put an increment cost on for when they lose business from postal strikes...
Judging by the quantity of pre-paid vouchers that are taken by newsagents in exchange for the Telegraph. It would seem that it only some readers who pay the full price for it.
There is not another paper that gives these "pre-paid" vouchers out. Perhaps this is why they have banged a 10p increase on their paper. Maybe If their readers stopped buying the paper they would soon reduce it.
Some newspapers even give !0p - 15p off vouchers, to induce the public to buy their newspapers.
Nobody is forced into buying any newspaper. Anyone with an ounce of sense would see that they are just out to sensationalize, distort and lie about things. Why buy them??!!
Actually, nobody does since my newsagent fled to Pakistan to avoid unpaid debts. Now I have to buy it myself. Or, as some have pointed out, read it online. I can cope with reading short news stories on a screen but I find reading longer articles more difficult, but maybe that's just me.