Because of the massive amount of media coverage, and the voracity of the protesters, it's easy to loose sight of the realities of the hunting debate. Considering the very few numbers of foxes that are actualy caught, the ban on hunting will have a negligable effect on the fox population. There is nothing stopping people from riding - the absence of a fox to chase simply removes that aspect of their pleasure - and it is the chase the hunters enjoy, the catching of a fox is entirely incidental. I would never take pleasure in anyone losing their livelyhood, but a relatively small number of people will loose jobs, compared with the hundreds of thousands who have had to adapt to changes in their world of work - miners, potters, shipbuilders, steelworkers, car workers, and so on - and no such protest was raised by, or indeed for them. Hunting is an outdated barbaric activity which has no place in a civilised society - and has nothing to do with class or money - cruelty is no respecter of such notions as social class. The hun supporters who leave dead animals as a protest simply further the argument against what they do - the needless death of an animal for sport is unacceptable, the ban is favoured by the majority, and minority, however committed they are, must accept that the days of their 'sport' are happily numbered.