News4 mins ago
micro chip
13 Answers
The Government is considering making micro chips compulsory for dogs.
Can you ,already, hear the screams of the Human Rights mob? Owners rights abused !!
Can you ,already, hear the screams of the Human Rights mob? Owners rights abused !!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by brionon. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
someone is bound to complain but i dont see a problem with it. The RSPCA chip all rehomed animals and it does help many lost pets find there way back to their owners too. What i always found was the main reason people used for not having it done was cost. Vets used to charge �40-�50 per animal and yet the chips are sold to them at very low cost.
The human rights mob will be better off waiting for the time when people are chipped.
The human rights mob will be better off waiting for the time when people are chipped.
-- answer removed --
One problem that puts people off is that the microchip can migrate and end up anywhere in the pet.
Sometimes they cannot be found or become inactive.
Also you can get cysts forming around the site of injection.
There are a number of different microchips and scanners do not read them all, also not every dog warden etc. scan dogs.
My dog is never out on his own and has never (and will never) 'get lost' so I don't personnally see the point of injecting something foreign into his body.
If I was looking for a form of identification then I would go for a tattoo.
How would the government implement a law like this without introducing dog registration? How much would that cost and how on earth would they police it? Only responsible people would get their dogs registered. I cannot imagine every single police officer carrying a scanner and stopping every dog owner he passed on the street demanding to scan their dog!
Sometimes they cannot be found or become inactive.
Also you can get cysts forming around the site of injection.
There are a number of different microchips and scanners do not read them all, also not every dog warden etc. scan dogs.
My dog is never out on his own and has never (and will never) 'get lost' so I don't personnally see the point of injecting something foreign into his body.
If I was looking for a form of identification then I would go for a tattoo.
How would the government implement a law like this without introducing dog registration? How much would that cost and how on earth would they police it? Only responsible people would get their dogs registered. I cannot imagine every single police officer carrying a scanner and stopping every dog owner he passed on the street demanding to scan their dog!
-- answer removed --