News4 mins ago
Why are there no additional jurors?
I have often wondered why we do not have additional jurors sitting on a jury. I know only 12 can judge a case but surley there have been many instances where a trial has had to be cancelled when a juror fell ill and the case had to start again. Why can't there be some alternate jurors (as in America) who are able to take the place of one of the original 12 if one has to leave for whatever reason and then, when it is time for the jury to deliberate, any alternate jurors are dismissed and the 12 jurors can decide the case without any need for a case to start again?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by osprey. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.In England and Wales a crown court trial can continue so long as there are 9 jurors left to consider a verdict.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_%28England_a nd_Wales%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_%28England_a nd_Wales%29
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.