Editor's Blog1 min ago
Politics
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by dreamscape. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I do not consider
- "repatriation" of all non-white people to their "ancestral homelands" within ten years
- persecution of all Muslims on the pretext of fighting Islamic fundamentalism
- banning abortion
- banning gay relationships
- abandoning all human rights legislation
- trade barriers, protection and restriction of free international trade
- tolerating members with serious criminal records
- making crude anti-Semitic remarks about Michael Howard
- denying or joking about the Holocaust
to be "common sense".
No, I do agree with the fact that the BNP exists - they are a legitimate Political Party - and aslo to be a member of the BNP does not infer racism. They have a number of other manifesto points which are valid - though I do agree that a lot of them are not (in my opinion).
Saying that they should not exist is pretty much the same as saying that anything I disagre with should not exist.
I would also say that calling them a bunch of thugs and appeal to the criminally minded minority is an outrageous slur against many people.
Also, before anyone says that I am a liberal do gooder, I do feel I should point out (as I have done previously) that I am of Asian origin, and if the BNP ever came to power (which IMO is highly unlikely thanks to the majority of people) I would be repatriated!
I do believe in Voltarism though - I may not agree with what you say but I will defend with my life the right for you to say it!
(well maybe not my life, but you get the point)
There is rarely any degree of common sense at either end of the political spectrum. I can only assume that that question was posed as a wind up as the general views of the majority of ABers are evident.
In the main BNP followers want to blame anyone but themselves for being less sucessfuly than identifiable minority groups (by what definition is possible). Time and again it is proven that it is their own inadequecies that create their own problems.
To answer the question posed, it is because a majority of people do not consider the manifesto common sense that they are considered an extremist party.
In the same way that if someone joins CND they can still support nuclear power.
A lot of people have joined the BNP due to this governements ridiculous use of positive discrimination. It is easy to vote / join a party that has outlandish manifesto pledges in the knowledge that they will never get in. It does however, send a message to the government in power.
As for Bernado's note:
Banning abortion & banning gay relationships are a fairly standard thing in the biggest democracy in the world.
tolerating members with serious criminal records - I would be curious as to how old these were - and are criminals not allowed to be members of political parties - I beleive Richard Branson was convicted of VAT fraud when he was a young lad.
Making crude anti-semantic remarks about Michael Howard - a person did this not a party - and if views are not allowed to be aired - lets get rid of all the papers.
Denying or joking about the holocaudt - I am not sure that this is again anything to do with their manifesto.