Donate SIGN UP

J.K. Rowling Statement from here site

Avatar Image
harryfan | 18:38 Wed 14th Jul 2004 | Arts & Literature
10 Answers
I was delighted to see that a hard core of super bright fans knew that the real title was once, in the long distant past, a possibility for the 'Chamber of Secrets', and from that from that deduced that it was genuine. Certain crucial pieces of information in book six were originally planned for 'Chamber of Secrets', but very early on (first draft of Chamber) I realised that this information that this information's proper home was in book six. I have said before now that 'Chamber' holds some very importent clues to the ultimate end of the series. Not as many as six, obviously, but there is a link. She never mentions that the contents or CoS was writen for the Title HBP. She did say that very early she cut out the stuff for the HBP. Never said anything about changing the title after writing it. And it doesn't said that the half blood rince was introduced in Book 2 either. Seriously people were do you get your information. Do some research.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by harryfan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
This site is called Answerbank.com. You ask a question to which an answer exists and people will answer it. Its really quite a simple premise. You are not asking a question that fits into this site's design. Please take this potter garbage discussion onto a website that caters for this inane speculatory rambling.
sorry, TheAnswerbank.co.uk
Have to agree with MrIxolite. How is this a question seeking an answer? Some of the HP topics here are actual questions (the one about the door on the website, for instance), but most of them seem to be inviting speculation rather than answers, or in the case of this "question" and your earlier one repeating the information you had posted in response to a semi-query are mere statements.
Question Author
Well sorry I am trying to make a point. I here so many people talking that I swear have never read a book in there life. And no one ever read through the entire message board so I decided to make this so that every one can see it and understand stuff before the decide to answer with something stupid
And there you hit the point. These are not message boards. This is not a fan forum,nor a debating forum.
Here's an answer: all that you just said in the post was bologne
Question Author
Wel if U read anything in the other Harry potter forums and U knew the answer and have answered it already, But yet everyone is still saying the same stupid things, then U would understand where I am coming from.....
I understand where you're coming from Harryfan.
Question Author
Thanks Punky

Well im sure we know that the hand of glory is already a mistery to readers. Why did she use "the hand of glory". The intersesting thing is is that the hand of glory is indeed a real thing. It is a hand cut off someone who has been hung to death. Maybe that particular hand was of someone who was hung but is very important to the plot.  This is of course just a guess. I also have many other theories out of the Chamber of Secrets.

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Do you know the answer?

J.K. Rowling Statement from here site

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.