ChatterBank7 mins ago
Where is he now?
14 Answers
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news /islamists-guilty-of-inciting-and-funding-terr orism-811225.html
Also found guilty of terrorist fund-raising were Simon Keeler and Abdul Muhid, both of White-chapel, east London, and Shah Jalal Hussain, who is missing after failing to appear at court
Why was this terrorist allowed bail, when those in the Sharron Mathew case have been remanded until November?
Who is the biggest threat?
Terrorist suspects once arrested should be remanded in custody, until their trial.
Also found guilty of terrorist fund-raising were Simon Keeler and Abdul Muhid, both of White-chapel, east London, and Shah Jalal Hussain, who is missing after failing to appear at court
Why was this terrorist allowed bail, when those in the Sharron Mathew case have been remanded until November?
Who is the biggest threat?
Terrorist suspects once arrested should be remanded in custody, until their trial.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.You should keep up to date with the news !!
Shah Jalal Hussain handed himelf into the police this morning.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7354229.stm
Shah Jalal Hussain handed himelf into the police this morning.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7354229.stm
-- answer removed --
I know many would not like this here but I believe you can not brand someone terrorist only because he or she does not agree with you.
I think we need to redefine terrorism. Because If saying that Coalition forces are in fact invading forces and they should not be in Iraq and Afghanistan because this is not a war because of WMD but Oil, then even UNO should be sentenced. Because when USA invaded Iraq, that was against the United Nation�s resolutions. Majority of Americans including senators, scholars and so many others say the same thing now and they believe George Bush is the biggest terrorist.
So if we take that as the right approach, then anyone who says against this Mission Impossible should not be branded as a terrorist.
Same as IRA were branded terrorist organization by the English but freedom fighters by the Irish.
I think we need to redefine terrorism. Because If saying that Coalition forces are in fact invading forces and they should not be in Iraq and Afghanistan because this is not a war because of WMD but Oil, then even UNO should be sentenced. Because when USA invaded Iraq, that was against the United Nation�s resolutions. Majority of Americans including senators, scholars and so many others say the same thing now and they believe George Bush is the biggest terrorist.
So if we take that as the right approach, then anyone who says against this Mission Impossible should not be branded as a terrorist.
Same as IRA were branded terrorist organization by the English but freedom fighters by the Irish.
Anotheoldgit - No one can be a terrorist just because he speaks about it and that is what I am saying. What would you do if an American air strike kill you and your family in your own country, in your own bedroom when you are asleep . Now I would let you decide whether these people put more bombs under someone�s family (just by speaking about attacks on an army which has invaded a country) or the soldiers who have invaded that country.
You can not kill someone just because you speak about it.
You can not kill someone just because you speak about it.
The other men due to be sentenced include Abu Izzadeen, 32, who was tried under his real name, Omar Brooks.
He was found guilty of terrorist fundraising and inciting terrorism overseas.>/i>
He faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment after a court heard of his support, in November 2004, for al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden.
He was also recorded calling for a jihad-style war against coalition forces occupying Iraq.,/i>
Life Sentence???? he actualiy got Four and a half years, maybe be out in less than two years, most likely on full benefits, soft Britain.
He was found guilty of terrorist fundraising and inciting terrorism overseas.>/i>
He faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment after a court heard of his support, in November 2004, for al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden.
He was also recorded calling for a jihad-style war against coalition forces occupying Iraq.,/i>
Life Sentence???? he actualiy got Four and a half years, maybe be out in less than two years, most likely on full benefits, soft Britain.
Persian lady - You might call me a terrorist because that is what anyone would get for speaking out. I thing state terrorism is as bad as any other terrorism. If speaking against the injustice is terrorism then yes you may call me a terrorist. But before that read what I said at the top, who defines terrorism it all depends on that who is the terrorist.
Everyone knows that the people who were heroes yesterday in the eyes of the USA and the west today the same people are terrorists. And I can assure you very soon these people will become heroes again.
Everyone knows that the people who were heroes yesterday in the eyes of the USA and the west today the same people are terrorists. And I can assure you very soon these people will become heroes again.