What If The Labour Party Got Rid Of...
Politics4 mins ago
Ok, I don't want to sound like a whinger and I've had a good read through lots of questions on here none of which seem to cover what I want to know so any help would be appreciated.
I'm a Senior Secretary (nonsense title). The Company I work for has gone through several restructures over the last year (redundancies). Sadly i've managed to survive both times! However being one of the few people left means that they're expecting me to not only lose the responsibility of working for the Ops Director but taking a junior position working for a lot more people. They intend on changing my job description too.
My questions are:
- can they change my job description without my agreement?
- if i am forced into the job and then leave, would this be considered constructive dismissal?
I am applying for other jobs (fingers crossed), gotta get outta here, they treat people like sh*t. They've already stitched up several of my colleages.
No best answer has yet been selected by Ells. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Try to keep a diary. If you have not got time to sit down and write (which he'll probably make sure you don't) - you might even use one of those audio typing thingies if you have them in your office. If he knows you are keeping "contemporary" notes he might (perhaps) be a little more cautious. Unfortunately employment law is biased in the employer's favour. So if you don't go through the internal procedure first, they'll count that against you. If you leave too soon, they'll say you did not give it a good try. If you stay on too long, they'll say you had accepted the employer's changes and treatment of you. So you need to stick to procedures to keep you "whiter than white". Incidentally, as far as I know (hope Miss Zippy corrects me if I am wrong) you do not need to have actually left to initiate proceedings - but that's as far as my knowledge goes. By the way I used to work for a company that treated people like they are treating you. Yours wouldn't be an oilfield services company by any chance? We are not supposed to name names here.
On a more general level you might be interested to follow this link (hope it works). http://www.guardian.co.uk/analysis/story/0,,1357367,00.html
It is to the Guardian newspaper 23 Nov 04; it published a summary of Prof. Sir Bob Hepple (Cambridge)'s Hamlyn lecture on European labour laws and how they will impact here.
Three years ago, my wife was in a similar situation and to cut a long story short her company attempted to 'downgrade' by her changing her job description. When they offered her the new position she refused to accept it and as such was made 'redundant'.
So she took them to tribunal. She had the full backing of her union, had a lawyer with a solid track-record, had a file of evidence nearly 3 inches thick, had independent witnesses to her ill-treatment, had correctly followed the grievance procedure & had a what seemed a clear breach of employment law on more than one account. No problem, you would think...
Well, to cut an even longer (but much more importantly, incredibly stressful) story short, my wife eventually settled out of court. Despite being offered a fraction of what I (and the solicitor) felt my wife deserved in compensation, it was the right decision for her though because there was still a chance that the tribunal would not find in her favour.
Being right is one thing, proving it is quite another.
Best advice I can offer:
You really do have my sympathies - good luck!
Thank you everyone! What an overwhelming response!
I fear that the 'Company' will almost always win and wonder whether it really is worth my time and worry to take it further. My line manager really does have me frightened to go through the greivance procedure. Tragic.
Hgrove - It's a construction company.