Some decent theories there, geezer, but no research to back them up. Which is where these debates often fall down.
"I don't give a t055 about "rehab" in the form currently practised."
Clearly, it's not working well enough. But that's because it's not readily available to enough prisoners, not because the concept is flawed. That much is made clear by the Prison Service itself in in a parliamentary report:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200 102/cmselect/cmpubacc/619/61903.htm#a1
"Rehab is good if it can be acheived, however it is extremely rare"
Is it? Anything to back that up? The research I've linked to suggests that drugs treatment programme, basic literacy and numeracy programmes and offending behaviour programmes (ie, rehabilitation) are all highly likely to reduce reoffending.
"most criminals will "play along" to get whatever reward is offered"
Does that matter if they emerge with qualifications and no drug habit? Therefore better equipped to get a job and stay clean.
"if a burglar knew he was going to serve a minium of 5 years in a proper jail minumum, he'd think twice about burgling my Granny"<i/>
Any evidence whatsoever to support that? Did you just pluck that figure out of the air?
"I agree it's good if they can be turned into hard working contributors but I'm afraid this is almost impossible as the mind set is wrong to start with." <i/>
Not according to alnost every piece of research into the subject.
"it's futile to credit these people with thoughts and feelings like your own."<i/>
Like you have here you mean? "if a burglar knew he was going to serve a minium of 5 years in a prope