Whatever it costs, jake (and I think it is not adjacent to diddly squat) it is not something that most London council taxpayers that I know like to see their money spent on.
Unemployed people receive benefits to meet their living expenses. In addition, despite what many may think, London bus fares are among the cheapest in the country. Maximum cash fare in London is �2 (Oyster is .90p). A five mile trip in rural Kent costs �3.80. A seven mile trip in Oxfordshire costs �3.50. A two mile hop in Devon - two years ago - was �2.20, A one day travelcard on the Isle of Wight is �10 (London �7, including tubes, trams, national rail and DLR). Unless the policy is adopted nationally (like the �Freedom Pass�) there is no justification to place an additional burden on London taxpayers to subside the unemployed.
Many people are also surprised to learn that (again thanks to Mr Livingstone's profligacy) children and young people under the age of 18 in full-time education are also entitled to free travel on buses, and those under 11 travel free on tubes, DLR and London Overground. This is (according to the former mayor) �to allow them to take advantage of the cultural and educational facilities the Capital has to offer them�.
This, at least in the suburbs - whose voters ensured Boris's election success - consists of them sitting at the rear of the upper deck, smoking, drinking, playing loud music, etching the windows and throwing things at passers by.
Older people used to take the bus to avoid troublesome youngsters in the street. Now they are forced to walk in the rain whilst the youngsters travel in comfort aboard their mobile drop-in centres.
Perhaps this is something else the new Mayor might like to examine.