Moonshadow, which journals,research papers, randomised controlled trials,government white papers, nice or sign guidlines, department of health documents have you read that lead you to believe 'mercury' fillings have a detrimental/adverse effect on health as compared with alternative dental restorative materials? Also are you 100% positve that the theoretical/hypothetical/unproven toxic effects of 'mercury' fillings are greater than the adverse 'actual'/'proven'/theoretical risks of alternative restorative materials.