Has anyone noticed the Daily Mail is the most quoted daily paper in this news section.
Is it because of the way the Daily Mail journalists write?
One rule for Daily Mail journalists is to always quote huge sums of money when it comes to writing about asylum seekers and immigrants.
The journalists dont actually KNOW how much they are getting in benefits, or how much security is costing, so they just throw in a number that sounds awful enough to upset Daily Mail readers.
For example the question above says "�50,000 a day", but nowhere in the article does it say "�50,000 a day" for anything.
Dont get me wrong, I am no fan of Abu Hamza and if he died tomorrow I would shout with joy, but we do have to be careful of believeing everything (anything?) the Daily Mail writes.
Read the Daily Mail, but try to look through the WAY it is written. Many articles are written deliberately to upset the Daily Mail reader, dont let them succed.