Quizzes & Puzzles13 mins ago
Number plates
Hi, someone told me that new number plates must no longer have the name of the maker on the bottom of the plate, is it true? If so what are the new laws?
Thanks
Thanks
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by barnpot. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Plates fitted to models registered after 1 September 2001 that aren�t embossed with the name and postcode of the supplier and BS AU145d British Standard symbol will result in an automatic failure. The move is des�igned to make it easy for testers to spot non-road-legal �show plates�, as these don�t have a BS symbol.
a section from here:
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressn ews/210559/registration_plates.html
a section from here:
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressn ews/210559/registration_plates.html
-- answer removed --
According to the number plate registration act ........
http://www.regtransfers.co.uk/main/car_numberp lates_regulations.asp
Panic button is correct, chas seems to be making illegal plates.
http://www.regtransfers.co.uk/main/car_numberp lates_regulations.asp
Panic button is correct, chas seems to be making illegal plates.
Plates fitted on or after 1st September 2001 need not be exclusively BS AU 145d - they can also conform to any other relevant standard or specification recognised for use in an EEA State and which, when in use, offers a performance equivalent to that offered by a plate complying with the British Standard specification. In either case the plate must be marked as to allow identification of that standard or specification.
http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?a ctiveTextDocId=2579139
VOSA incorporated extended checks for compliance with the 2001 regs into the MOT test schedule from 1st October 2007 but a legal hitch meant that these were temporarily suspended as a reason for MOT failure in November. My guess for the suspension (in part) is that the MOT Inspection Manual also specified the BS AU 145d marking requirement without allowing for another equivalent mark.
You can view the MOT Special Notice about suspension of the checks here...
http://www.vosa.gov.uk/vosacorp/repository/Spe cial%20Notice%2010-07.pdf
Regardless of the MOT testing status, non conformity to the 2001 regs is an offence.
http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?a ctiveTextDocId=2579139
VOSA incorporated extended checks for compliance with the 2001 regs into the MOT test schedule from 1st October 2007 but a legal hitch meant that these were temporarily suspended as a reason for MOT failure in November. My guess for the suspension (in part) is that the MOT Inspection Manual also specified the BS AU 145d marking requirement without allowing for another equivalent mark.
You can view the MOT Special Notice about suspension of the checks here...
http://www.vosa.gov.uk/vosacorp/repository/Spe cial%20Notice%2010-07.pdf
Regardless of the MOT testing status, non conformity to the 2001 regs is an offence.
think they did enforce it for a while but suspended it due to some technicality, i think the legislation on selling them however states that the postcode of the place making/selling them etc must be printed on the plate along with the british standards bumph, what everyone else has confirmed really. however the sofware we used in the place i used to work gave you the option whether to print this on the plate or not, maybe more up to date software doesnt allow this nowadays, been a couple of years since i worked in the motor trade