Numpties using Loose intead of Lose

[Avatar]

I picked up an actual printed book in Borders at the weekend and even that had the mis-spelling of lose as loose in it. I couldn't believe it.
What is the world coming to? Thick w4nkers.

[gelda]

I often see noone as in no one, I always thought that no one was correct, am I right or wrong?

[Avatar]

To the gentleman or woman, requesting me to quote form the source so there is a context, please permit me to complete my mornig vittals wherupon I shall drive back into town, return to the bookshop, try and remember the book I picked up and then hope it falls open on the same page as last time. I shall then memorise it, return to work and enlighten you. Thick w4nker.

[R1Geezer]

So Loose was in fact the correct word then, right oh! What a tw&t, semi illiterate ar5hole who assumes that a word is wrong and offers no example. If it disturbed you that much then you'd remember it sum dum.

Tell you what people, who do you think is most likely to be correct here? An author or a sub moronic numpty who can barely read let alone write. I think I know where my money is.

[Avatar]

Loose was the correct word? How did you make that giant leap of assumption? The only thing loose around here is your grip on reality.

[smudge]

I always write no one too gelda.

And, if you type noone into Google, it changes it to no one.

[gelda]

Thanks Smudge, I thought I was right but had seen it many times as noone.