ChatterBank2 mins ago
Baby P
20 Answers
What do you think of the social services that let this poor little fella down, should anyone be sacked, and what do you think should happen to those 3 people responsible?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lil75. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.all should be sacked. i posted a few months back that i have got to go to court next month after a neighbours daughter was beated up from birth to six months she is now 2 is hate to use the word but a vegetable i phoned ss over 50 times to report her and the police but nothing was done in the end they acted but it was too late.
social sevices are useless i was taken in to care at 9 months old and adopted out at the age of 4 my biological father and grandparents thought for custody but weren't granted it as social services failed to inform my father til 3 weeks b4 i was due to go to my adopted parents that i had even been born (1 night stand wasn't even aware my mum was pregnant).
don't get me wrong ss people aren't all bad but they either do to much or to little.
funding is short and they have to much work in the office and not out there with the families
social sevices are useless i was taken in to care at 9 months old and adopted out at the age of 4 my biological father and grandparents thought for custody but weren't granted it as social services failed to inform my father til 3 weeks b4 i was due to go to my adopted parents that i had even been born (1 night stand wasn't even aware my mum was pregnant).
don't get me wrong ss people aren't all bad but they either do to much or to little.
funding is short and they have to much work in the office and not out there with the families
Sorry, twasn't just Ethel
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Law/Question658 101.html
Baby P's real name appears here too
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Law/Question658 101.html
Baby P's real name appears here too
They should all be hanging their heads in shame. They did not directly kill him like the 3 scum that did but they had a duty to protect this boy and they failed. In my opinion they are guilty of manslaughter. The 3 that did it - murder.
Eye for an eye. Do exactly the same to them as they did to this poor baby. I would happily watch them die a slow painful death and spit it the b**tards faces. I would also love to see them in a place with no protection and let the public loose on them.
Sky News is reporting that the killers names and photos have been released and they have receieved death threats so some are suggesting the sites are removed to protect their identity. Seriously....who are these people? Why on earth would they want to protect them? Name and shame them and give them what they deserve..........death.
Eye for an eye. Do exactly the same to them as they did to this poor baby. I would happily watch them die a slow painful death and spit it the b**tards faces. I would also love to see them in a place with no protection and let the public loose on them.
Sky News is reporting that the killers names and photos have been released and they have receieved death threats so some are suggesting the sites are removed to protect their identity. Seriously....who are these people? Why on earth would they want to protect them? Name and shame them and give them what they deserve..........death.