ChatterBank0 min ago
Why are the animal lib mob so thick?
Ok whatever you think of vivisection, whether it's necessary or not, don't matter, it will happen end of. So why do the geniuses from the ALF and co want to drive it out of UK where the rules are strict and it's all regulated properly, suffering no doubt occurs but it's a minimum. If they drive it out it'll get done somewhere as cheap as possible in some tin pot sh1t hole that couldn't give a rats ar5e about rules and regs and sufferring. Net result more animals suffer more! So can anyone explain this dipstickery? Or am I looking for logic where there is none?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
here loosehead filmed in england shown on channel 4
http://www.smallworldtv.co.uk/videos/broadcast %20out/dog.mov
:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
http://www.smallworldtv.co.uk/videos/broadcast %20out/dog.mov
:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
R1 i am not missing the point, watch some of the video's shot in this country, in todays guardian (front page) an Hls spokesman said ; Freedom of expression and lawful protest are important rights, Hls try to get courts to ban protests every week , when a protest was organised against novartis , novartis went to court to get it banned.these companies do not want you to see what is going on .
:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
http://www.animalliberationfront.com/ALFront/a lf-nottheterrorist.jpg
:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
from BBC news Jan 2001
In the UK the number of tests has halved since the 1970s when 5.5m animal experiments were carried out annually.
"But I can't see the end of animal testing in the foreseeable future," said Dr Matfield.
In fact, experts are predicting such testing is likely to increase due to a rapid expansion of genetic research.
According to the latest figures, there were 2,656,753 animal tests in the UK in 1999, slightly down on the 2,659,662 in 1998.
::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
In the UK the number of tests has halved since the 1970s when 5.5m animal experiments were carried out annually.
"But I can't see the end of animal testing in the foreseeable future," said Dr Matfield.
In fact, experts are predicting such testing is likely to increase due to a rapid expansion of genetic research.
According to the latest figures, there were 2,656,753 animal tests in the UK in 1999, slightly down on the 2,659,662 in 1998.
::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
I make my protest by not buying products that have been animal tested and I'm talking washing powders, cosmetics and some foods.
There is no point to that sort of testing.
I am against testing for the hell of it.
But for medical purposes, well thats another subject.
I would jot indulge in the sorts of protests that these people have. All life is sacred, you cannot punish others to make your point.
That is going against the very thinking of being against cruelty to animals.
There is no point to that sort of testing.
I am against testing for the hell of it.
But for medical purposes, well thats another subject.
I would jot indulge in the sorts of protests that these people have. All life is sacred, you cannot punish others to make your point.
That is going against the very thinking of being against cruelty to animals.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.