My. Tesco Android Signal Is Poor
Technology1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Space. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well because it's a Tuesday and I'm a little bored I thought I'd look into this - I'm a bit cynical on this as I cant see how we'd not notice any effect from putting people into MR scanners with Gigantic magnetic fields.
Now I couldn't get a copy of the precise abstract quoted but I found this one
http://www.healthandwellnessliving.com/library/Weintraub_Study.pdf
Now at first it all seems straight and above board - It's funded by magnetic device manufacturers which is worrying but that seems the norm in the US.
I started reading the tabulated results but they seemed at odds with the graphs and the conclusions. The conclusions and graphs seemed to show a definate effect but the tabulated results showed that whilst patients rated that their pain had decreased that drop was mostly within the margin of error.
In one of the better cases the treatment group rated their pain drop from 5.1 to 3.6 as opposed to the pacebo group drop of 5.3 to 4.
Sounds impressive until you realise that the variance in the score is typically plus or minus 2.5.
Personally I don't think you could hail these results with quite the enthusiasm that is claimed and whether this is due to the natural desire to produce an important result of whether funing is an element - well you can start to see how people can make the claims they do and draw on questionable research to keep themselves out of court.
Moral of the story? Ask who paid for the research!
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.