Donate SIGN UP

Amanda Knox ... STILL no evidence !

Avatar Image
joggerjayne | 21:01 Tue 14th Apr 2009 | ChatterBank
18 Answers
The Trial goes on ...

The reports appear each day ...

And there is STILL not a SCRAP of evidence against Amanda Knox.

I know you'll be fed up with me saying it, but ...

... Amanda Knox is innocent, and she WILL be acquitted.

http://bp2.blogger.com/_gaWrN5ejYGE/R551ulmYpS I/AAAAAAAABAU/EB0UeIekmjg/s1600-h/AmandaBlueDr ess.jpg
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by joggerjayne. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
and all because she has a pretty face...
Question Author
All because she is standing trial for a murder that she did not commit, and for which the killer is already in prison.

Hi, Cazzz .... I think you replied first when I last posted about Amanda Knox ...x

You just fancy her.

Of course she did it. Are you not following the trial?
-- answer removed --
Question Author
Panic ...

I am following it, and there's is no real evidence whatsoever.
its a closed trial so no one know exactly what is going on, and yes I replied last time following several posts remarking on how attractive knox is :D

I'm not following the trial, so excuse my ignorance, but why was she doing cartwheels down at the cop shop, just hours after her flat mate was brutally murdered. And why did she lie and say she wasn't in the supermarket that morning, when she was spotted by the owner buying an inordinate amount of cleaning products?
Question Author
Well ... she is attractive.

There is enough reported about the police's so-called "evidence" to demonstrate, beyond doubt, that Amanda Knox is being framed.
Question Author
Lies about the supermarket = Murderer

Nooooo !!!
the press merely speculate, hopefully the jury will make the right choice when given all of the evidence
Lies about the supermarket = Innocent ??

Nooooo !!!
Question Author
LOL

Hmmm. Maybe she did do it, after all.
-- answer removed --
I don't really have a gut feeling about this one, I'm afraid. But my ex was well acquainted with the family of Tracey Andrews who murdered her fiance (TA used to babysit his daughter many years ago) and from the moment she first appeared, making a false appeal, I told him that she was guilty. Was I right, or was I right???
Question Author
Right.
He did concede at the time that she was a complete fruitcake. Btw, he stopped her babysitting once he realised that.

So are you actually going to have a bet on Knox's acquittal, JJ? ;-)
You have changed your tune jayne! LOL!
She did it - no doubt about it. I refer you to the following website who have analysed her statements: http://www.eyesforlies.blogspot.com/2007/11/am anda-knox.html

Including her initial statement to the police:

"Patrick and Meredith were in Meredith's room while I stayed in the kitchen. I can't remember how long they were together in the room, but I can only say that at a certain point I heard Meredith screaming and I was scared so I covered my ears. After that, I don't remember everything, my head is very confused."

Regarding "not a shred of evidence" - how about Miss Knox's DNA on the murder weapon?

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Amanda Knox ... STILL no evidence !

Answer Question >>