Leanne Salt

[flip_flop]

Why has my question about Leanne Salt been removed?

http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question74 8124.html

(I Don't know whether I can post a link to a banned question, so it may or may not work!).

As far as I can tell, with the exception of Gromit (quelle surprise), pretty much everybody agrees this beast is an unfit mother.

So why did Nanny AB pull the question?

[flip_flop]

Well clearly you do care what I think otherwise your reponse wouldn't have been quite so vociferous.

You refer to the abuse of her children as 'shortcomings', which I find quote disturbing - it almost smacks of tacit approval.

[Totterdown]

Well, I do NOT care what you think. I do not approve of child abuse, but then I do not agree with your interpretation of abuse. You find my interpretation of "shortcomings" as disturbing. Are you a psychiatrist or something? It is you who is getting a bit above yourself spouting out rubbish like that. This (at the time of typing) is the 22nd reply. How many of those agree with you? I and the other people who have replied have something you have not. A bit of humanity, understanding and a wish for help to make this mother a more responsible mother, not just to take her children away from her.

[ummmm]

Totterdown - In the last thread, which was banned, most people were agreeing and saying the kids should be taken off her.

Did anyone use to watch 'Honey, we're killing the kids'?

Vary lovely families who over fed their off spring. Should all the kids on that program be taken into care?

Or is just Leanne Salt because you find her repulsive?

[Totterdown]

ummmm, no I did not read the other thread. I didn't quite understand your last sentence. Where did I say that I find Leanne Salt repulsive? Or did you mean that flip_flop finds this mother repulsive? I agree that anyone who overfeeds their children or do not feed them properly needs guidance, but that does not mean children should be taken into care. I am totally against flip_flop's solution to this. I find her views repulsive, not Leanne Salt who I consider msguided.

[ummmm]

I meant flip flop....not you.

On the original thread she called her some choice names and I think that's why it was banned.

[flip_flop]

Not for the first time people are mistaking me for a woman. Why is that? Is it the nature of my answers or my AB name or what?

Clearly we are never going to agree - which is one of the attractions of AB - but it just goes to show how different the responses can be to different threads covering the same subject.

As ummmm says, in my previous thread, pretty much everybody agreed that Leanne Salt is a disgrace, whereas in this thread it is vice versa!

For the record;

1 - I do find her repulsive.
2 - I do believe what she is doing is tantamount to child abuse.
3 - If her kids aren't going to be taken away, at the very least I think they should be put on the list that idenitifies children as being in danger (if she continues to abuse her children the way she is, as sure as eggs are eggs, they will be in danger).
4 - I am sickened that it is my taxes (and yours and every other tax payer) that pays this woman to allow her to lead a f e ckless lifestyle.

We will be paying this woman benefits for the rest of her life, we will be paying for her three children (at the moment - it is likely to be more than three at some point in the future) at least until they are 18, but in all possibility for the rest of their lives too becuase they will, naturally, see their mother as setting them an example of how to live - they will possibly consider it is acceptable not to work. Then add her children's children ad infinitum.

Seriously - doesn't this concern people?

In my banned thread,New Judge stated that "The Social Services budget for the coming year will just about be met by the entire Income Tax and National Insurance take combined"

If this doesn't concern you, it bloody well should.

Leanne Salt and her ilk are royally taking the michael out of everybody who is conscientious enough to work.

[ummmm]

Maybe all the publicity will shame her into action. I read on here yesterday that she was GMTV or something. They are bound to lead her in the right direction.

Sorry for thinking you was a girl :-)

[Joy11]

what about the "sperm donor" in all of this, where the hell is he?

[flip_flop]

I assume trotterdowm must agree with my post of 10.29.

The sperm donor, joy, is scum - and like other chav scum is fleecing us idiots that choose to work.

[Totterdown]

Agree with your post? You must be joking. Obviously you are just goading me into replying and to my shame I am. But I will not again. Your views are beneath contempt.

[Totterdown]

HPSauce, flip_flop's views on benefit scroungers and the unemployed and people having children nilly willy, are not what the original question was all about, but he conveniently brought these issues into it to try to justify his belief that this mother is unfit and should have her children taken away from her and using appalling language about her i.e. using such words as grotesquely obese, beast, scum, ugly. Of course people do not like being taken for a ride but that is not the original debate. I choose not to answer him again, that is my perogative. How am I part of the problem? I am not a benefit scrounger, never have been. Neither have I brought children into the world that I could not look after. Or is that not what you meant?