News1 min ago
Hell Hath no fury......
.....like a bunch of lefty bigots scorned!
According to The British Adoption society, if you do not agree with gay adoption you are a "retarded homophobe"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-118138 0/Slurred-adoption-Nazis-Critics-gay-parenting -branded-retarded-homophobes.html
Is this every bit as bigotted as the normal opinions that are branded as such?
According to The British Adoption society, if you do not agree with gay adoption you are a "retarded homophobe"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-118138 0/Slurred-adoption-Nazis-Critics-gay-parenting -branded-retarded-homophobes.html
Is this every bit as bigotted as the normal opinions that are branded as such?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Sp, you really don�t read what others say, do you? You contributed to the discussion on this subject on the other thread, as did I, but it seems that everything I said went completely over your head. Never mind. �To clarify�, I�ll copy some of it here.
If it's a choice between two loving parents of the same sex, and a life in care, I know which I'd choose.
And �.
�.Surely rather than commit a child to various foster homes, shoving it from pillar to post, or abandoning it to a children's home until it's 17 when it then faces the world alone in some bedsit somewhere, it's preferable for it to be part of a family unit and raised by two people who will love it?
And �.
Whether children are with their natural parents, with one natural parent, with aunts, uncles, grandparents, or with adoptive parents, same sex or otherwise, they need a loving, stable, home - it's as simple as that - and if we can provide it, then we should.
I never said that gay adoption goes against common sense, and I think the above would indicate that gay adoption doesn�t �bother� me. You�ve unwittingly proven my point that those who think they're �progressive� don�t actually take the trouble to �think� before applying the �phobic� label. Your reaction has, in fact, provided a perfect example of exactly what I was talking about . Thank you for illustrating it so clearly. I rest my case.
If it's a choice between two loving parents of the same sex, and a life in care, I know which I'd choose.
And �.
�.Surely rather than commit a child to various foster homes, shoving it from pillar to post, or abandoning it to a children's home until it's 17 when it then faces the world alone in some bedsit somewhere, it's preferable for it to be part of a family unit and raised by two people who will love it?
And �.
Whether children are with their natural parents, with one natural parent, with aunts, uncles, grandparents, or with adoptive parents, same sex or otherwise, they need a loving, stable, home - it's as simple as that - and if we can provide it, then we should.
I never said that gay adoption goes against common sense, and I think the above would indicate that gay adoption doesn�t �bother� me. You�ve unwittingly proven my point that those who think they're �progressive� don�t actually take the trouble to �think� before applying the �phobic� label. Your reaction has, in fact, provided a perfect example of exactly what I was talking about . Thank you for illustrating it so clearly. I rest my case.
