Science8 mins ago
Speeding/Congestion
Does anyone agree with my view that part of the reason there is too much congestion on the road is that too many bloody people drive too god damn slow!!! Too many times i get stuck behind some muppet doing 40 in a 60 zone and i can't overtake him cos its a bendy road. Or even if its in the dark, the car in front does'nt put his main beam on so i can see if its possible to have him!!! My question is, do you think drivers who drive well below the speed limit ought to be punished as much as someone who drives say, 44mph in a 40 zone??
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by toonmilo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I agree, there is in fact an offence of driving to slow and in some places there are minimum speed limits but I doubt if anyone has ever been prosecuted.
I've seen some old buffer doing 30 on dual carraigeway and the absolute rolling road block it causes. Trucks and coaches trying to overtake, much more dangerous than speeding.
Another reason there is congestion is that so many people stop at roundabouts when they don't have to, I mean it's almost as if they are not allowed to look until they get there!
Personally I stick to speed limits and drive safe but others tend to go the go slow route.
Most modern cars can far out-brake even the longest stopping distance in the highway code and they have no problem swiftly reaching the legal speed limit.
You can fail a driving test or get a fine from a police officer for 'not keeping up with the flow of traffic'.
Speed limits are the law and if you stick to them all well and good, the highway code says to adjust your driving as per weather and such like.
Also lots of congestion is caused by narrow roads and mini roundabouts (how many folk forget how they work???!!!) that causes 'bottlenecks in the system'.
What causes the problems on main roads are vehicles travelling at disproportionately different speeds, and inconsiderate use of road space (the man who owns the middle lane) or the two HGVs who take it in turns to pass one another because one goes 1mph faster than the other up the hill and 1mph slower down, and of course bad road design, (eg too many junctions on the M25)
How about adding people who make no, or misleading, signals to the list of culprits.
I've been stuck many times before behind an old woman doing 30 (20 up hills, how painful is that?) in a 60 speed limit in the rush hour yet I'm unable to overtake because of oncoming traffic and a bendy road!!
I think there should be some way of banning people from driving at peak times, such as rush hours and friday afternoon/evenings before a bank holiday.
Yes I do realise that that's unreasonable, but so is having uncompetent drivers driving cars.
So, picking up from all the posts,
Yes on your driving test and in general driving the Highway Code requires you to drive to the speed limit as long as all conditions allow. You will be given a serious error (fail) if you unreasonably hold up traffic.
There have been cases (very, very rare) when drivers have been prosecuted for driving too slowly, I think the last one was earlier this year when a body drove for miles at 15mph. The enforcement of this speed requirement by the police seems to have gone out of the window together with so many other traffic offences.
I don't agree with the assessment that more cars can fit on a road at slower speeds. How many cars in a given distance at a given speed? In good weather there should be 2 seconds between cars. At 60mph there should be 176' clearance, plus the length of your car, call it total 190'. So in a mile of road you should have 1760*3/190=28 cars each completing its transit in 60sec. At 30mph there should be 88' plus car length=102'. So in a mile of road 1760*3/102=52 cars each completing their transit in 120sec. So in 2mins it's 56cars @ 60mph and 52 @ 30. In an hour 3,360 cars @ 60 and 3,120 @ 30. Difference of 240/hr or 4 cars/min.
In order to improve the general standard of driving how would you all feel about having to retake your driving test every 5 years? Should learners be taught and tested to a higher standard? How many of us would pass a higher standard of test? (HGV drivers already do, so why not the rest of us?)
You should drive up to the speed limits IF and only IF the circumstances are safe, as has been covered. To drive at less in such circumstances shows poor attention levels on the part of that person and is also inconsiderate, that person is also going to cause frustration, road rage and other vehcles are likely to take mis calculated risks. Tim has said correctly about stopping distances etc, and to summerise it is probaly more important to keep a safe stopping distance than the actual speed itself, given safe circumstances.( I am not saying break the speed limit) In ANY given situation the hazard perception skills are the most imprtant, these along with the control skills go hand in hand, even the best person in the world with great control skills is useless without hazard perception.
What do we do about it? well retraining/testing would be nice, but attitudes first. we must all recognise that we can all improve, and that not everybody wants to nor has he desire to be a good driver from whatever reason, we must accept this and make allowances for this, then we areselves are on the right road.(excuse the pun)