ChatterBank0 min ago
Does This Punishment Fit The "Crime"?
7 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-119932 7/Businessman-loses-20-000-court-battle-taking -judge-neighbour-dog-dispute.html
The "offender's" dogs left a whoopsie on the Judge's lawn, and she then had him prosecuted to the tune of �20000.
A fair punishment? Or a doggone liberty M'Lud?
The "offender's" dogs left a whoopsie on the Judge's lawn, and she then had him prosecuted to the tune of �20000.
A fair punishment? Or a doggone liberty M'Lud?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by paraffin. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm agreeing with you Ice love. I think the amount is outrageous to say the least!!! Just saying, that it's because technically she has abused the 'use' of the law simply because she is a Judge. Does anybody kid themselves to believe that the same rule / amount of comp. would have been given if she was a road sweeper?? No way! & yes, it's yer man's job to clear up his dogs doos and not let them unto others property - but hey 20K? A Joke!!
I'm off to me bed now girls & boys!! Hear you later.
I'm off to me bed now girls & boys!! Hear you later.
The man was ordered to pay �500 in damages, not �20,000 � this was made up of the legal costs, which he was ordered to pay as is so often the case.
There is a lot more to this case than simply a doogiedoo in the woman�s lawn. No person should have to put up with being confronted by menacing dogs where they are legally entitled to go, especially on their own property.
The legal action was taken only after the man failed to uphold his promise to keep the dogs under control.
This sensationalising only helps the anti-dog brigade with more ammunition.
There is a lot more to this case than simply a doogiedoo in the woman�s lawn. No person should have to put up with being confronted by menacing dogs where they are legally entitled to go, especially on their own property.
The legal action was taken only after the man failed to uphold his promise to keep the dogs under control.
This sensationalising only helps the anti-dog brigade with more ammunition.