Home & Garden0 min ago
Human Rights for troops?
4 Answers
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/11418 8/Fight-over-soldiers-rights-rule
Should our troops be protected the same as anyone else, by the the Human Rights Act?
Take away the glasses and trim the moustache, remind you of anyone?
http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk/img/dynamic/1 /285x214/114188_1.jpg
Should our troops be protected the same as anyone else, by the the Human Rights Act?
Take away the glasses and trim the moustache, remind you of anyone?
http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk/img/dynamic/1 /285x214/114188_1.jpg
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.When someone joins the military they are aware that they face risks which ordinary people will not be confronted with and they accept that.
But that does not mean they forego all their rights. If they should die or are injured by inadequate kit or as a result of incompetence, then those responsible should be prosecuted like any shoddy employer would be.
But that does not mean they forego all their rights. If they should die or are injured by inadequate kit or as a result of incompetence, then those responsible should be prosecuted like any shoddy employer would be.
No General has the troops or equipment he feels he needs, the Italian campaign is a testament to that truism, and what did the Germans call our tanks at the time?
Tommy Cookers.
During the Great War the front line troops often complained about the provisions, if you go further back we lost more to disease than wounds in the second Anglo Boer War and then you've got the Crimean war too, some things never change.
The problem stems from the expenses scandal more than anything else.
For all the references to the Vietnam war the analogy doesn't stand up, tactically at least, the great lessons from that war were, experienced troops are better in combat and flying about in helicopters won't win any ground.
It appears to me that some people think it is possible to wage war without tears, it's not.
Tommy Cookers.
During the Great War the front line troops often complained about the provisions, if you go further back we lost more to disease than wounds in the second Anglo Boer War and then you've got the Crimean war too, some things never change.
The problem stems from the expenses scandal more than anything else.
For all the references to the Vietnam war the analogy doesn't stand up, tactically at least, the great lessons from that war were, experienced troops are better in combat and flying about in helicopters won't win any ground.
It appears to me that some people think it is possible to wage war without tears, it's not.