�65,000 may not be a small fortune but is perfectly adequate for the M P's we have at the moment.
They decided the money wasn't good enough and exploited the expenses system to their own advantage.not one said they were wrong, all said it was in the rules.
well,read the rules,Allowances are reimbursed only for the purpose of a member carrying out his or her parliamentary duties.
does an MP require a duck house to carry out his parliamentary duties ? does an MP's daughter need to live rent free to enable the MP to carry out his Parliamentary duties?
this whole fiasco has nothing to do with an adequate wage,it comes under the heading of greed.