Editor's Blog1 min ago
the white stripes
i was watching some of glastonbury on friday night and i was unfortunate enough to catch some of the white stripes set.
it raised the question 'why are they popular?' - i really don't understand what the big deal is. jack white is hardly the world's greatest singer or musician and meg was clearly struggling to keep time on the really basic drumming she was trying to do. people like the fact that they are so raw, but there's a big difference between 'raw' and 'untalented'.
jack seems to do little else apart from bash out a couple of chunky chords, whine into the mic for a bit and repeat until megs arms get tired!
can anyone explain what i'm missing?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by secretsquiz. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I have heard stuff by them before and was never convinced but the Glastonbury performance totally changed my view. I thought they were amazing but as the other poster said it is all about perception. I thought Meg's drumming although basic has a kind of repetetive beat to it that sticks in your mind while Jack White has amazing charisma and total stage presence. Their image is also quite interesting and the stage set was amazing. On the music side I think he plays a mean guitar and is obviously multi-instrumental and I can hear influences ranging from Led Zeppelin to Black Sabbath. Their songs are also very short so there is plenty of variety. The Glasto gig really changed my point of view and I will be getting some of their CD's very soon.
Now if we are talking about talentless bands what about Babyshambles......
It's a well known fact that Meg isn't a great drummer. Or singer. But anyone who disputes that Jack is an amazing guitarist has probably been listening to bland rubbish like Oasis and Stereophonics for too long. The energy he puts in is extraordinary, after the Glasto set his arms were shaking with the effort of playing non stop for over an hour. On CD their sound is actually amazing. Live, they do sound a little rough but in my opinion *that* is the appeal. You will never see two live performances which are the same, which is more than I can say for most bands.
I'm a huge fan as you can probably tell, and I'm fed up with people bashing the stripes. They're an easy target because they're different. I can tell you that if you make an effort to listen to a record (i recommend White Blood Cells for a start) you'll hear that raw doesn't equal untalented. The recording is raw and imperfect, not the actual songs and chords. That's how they chose to do things.
ok - must be just me then!
before watching them at glasto i was of the opinion that they were nothing special, but there was nothing wrong with them. after watching the performance on friday i now fail to see why they are so popular.
i don't think a band should be called great simply because they are 'different', i don't go to gigs expecting to hear a band sound exactly the same as on CD and i certainly haven't been listening to oasis and the stereophonics!
and just because his arms were shaking at the end doesn't mean it was great! it just means he was knackered!
*remains completely unconvinced*