Technology3 mins ago
So we can't even decide who we can let in now!
Would you accept it if your neighbours could force you to let in someone you don't like? Looks like we've signed up for similar!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8304926.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8304926.stm
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal is a part of the British Government. It is there to make sure the Government of the day correctly applies the British Law (and does not ban some one on the hoof). It is a there to act as a check, and make sure the Government does not abuse iots position.
http://www.ait.gov.uk/
This is purely a British matter. There is no foreign or EU involvement in this process. Who are the neighbours you think are forcing us to accept this man into our country?
http://www.ait.gov.uk/
This is purely a British matter. There is no foreign or EU involvement in this process. Who are the neighbours you think are forcing us to accept this man into our country?
He is a publicity seeker and his presence here is likely to be met by protests which will cost us to police.
On the other hand, he is free to hold his views, and there are those who want to hear him.
Hard call, but I would keep him out because I don't think he has much to contribute which could not be done via his bizarre YouTube film.
On the other hand, he is free to hold his views, and there are those who want to hear him.
Hard call, but I would keep him out because I don't think he has much to contribute which could not be done via his bizarre YouTube film.
Probably but with a close eye - he's still subject to UK law and if he falls foul of Inciting racial hatred we should just kick him out.
Not prosecute him - he'd love that!
I note he was invited by UKIP one of who's MEPs recently said referring to someone a P@ki was no different to referring to someone as a Brummie.
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/opinion/Arun-Arora-Why-this-dancer.5723795.jp
Nice! I wonder what Mr Bloom MEP thinks of calling people n166ers? Perhaps the same as referring to someone as a scouser?
The more I learn about UKIP the less I like them
Not prosecute him - he'd love that!
I note he was invited by UKIP one of who's MEPs recently said referring to someone a P@ki was no different to referring to someone as a Brummie.
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/opinion/Arun-Arora-Why-this-dancer.5723795.jp
Nice! I wonder what Mr Bloom MEP thinks of calling people n166ers? Perhaps the same as referring to someone as a scouser?
The more I learn about UKIP the less I like them
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Seems like just another case of don't let anyone upset the Muslims.
There are laws in place which can be put into action if this person acts in any way that breaks the law.
It seems odd that the Government can ban anyone in this country that they disapprove of, yet on the other hand invite some of the Worlds most hated despots to pay State visits.
They even knighted one.
There are laws in place which can be put into action if this person acts in any way that breaks the law.
It seems odd that the Government can ban anyone in this country that they disapprove of, yet on the other hand invite some of the Worlds most hated despots to pay State visits.
They even knighted one.