The men (ahem) who bullied this person should be ashamed and are not fit to guard the crown.
There are criteria to be met in jobs such as the fire service, the applicant has to demonstrate the ability to carry somebody of a certain a specified distance or over specified obstacles in full breathing gear.
I work with some real fatties, you'd need a dozen firemen to lift em.
When the Titanic sank, The Suffragette movement denounced the women who got in the boats instead of the men saying that they should have refused to demonstrate their equal value.
The Russians never had a problem with the fighting efficacy of women during The Great Patriotic War (WW 2 to us) on one occasion the women went into fight when the men wouldn't (perhaps they felt they had more to prove), similarly the Poles of the second republic had no problem with women fighting during the short war with The People's Republic Of Ukraine and the Battle Of Lemberg (later renamed Lvov, I think it has since been handed to Ukraine and renamed, again, Lviv). I have no serious objection to women soldiering in the front line, if that's what they want.
The question any woman seeking to fight in the front line is not are you willing to kill for your country?
It's not are you willing to die for your country?
It is are you willing to risk getting raped for your country?
History teaches us that war and rape tend to run together very closely, ask T.E Lawrence.