Why do you close your posted threads on this site. Often in full debate.
I notice you have closed the one below. What is the point of that. Why post on a question and Answer site if you close it before there are any answers?
.......... and I'm happy to report that AOG is not the strategic military planning mastermind that Rov thinks he is - the Royal Engineers were up there over last weekend assessing the situation, well before the Daily Mail diverted attention from Afghanistan to matters closer to home.
Why should the poser of a question have the 'right' to shut the debate down? If you ask a question and don't like the answers... well tough. That's life isn't it?
Surely the only person who can legitimately close down a thread is the 'Web Master' (which is a ghastly phrase – is there another?)
Yes, Birdie. It's a damn silly 'innovation' from the new release of AnswerBank. It is a pointless solution to a problem that never existed in the first place.
Maybe Gromit some of us on here object to your rantings even when given the facts. We can all produce evidence to justify our case as there is a multitude of different answers to a probloem. Maybe you should speak from the heart instead of quoting from an encyclopedia of facts many of them irrelevent..
Gromit you may not have noticed but my posting about the Bailey bridge was not a question but a statement referring to an earlier answer given by AOG. We all know the questions rapidly disappear from the page within a couple of days and this was a way of adding substance to his answer.