ChatterBank2 mins ago
roman torture
doeas anyone know about roman torture techniques?? i need it for a topic in a big project so lots of info would be great.
Answers
http://www.u nsolvedmy... es.com/usm39 9407.html
18:34 Thu 17th Dec 2009
-- answer removed --
jno, not necessarily, the end result of death was more often the intention. you are reight about the romans being ingeniious and they employed many forms of torture that ultimatley bought about a slow painful death. often i would have thought death was a release so they pronlonged it as much as possible.
a case in point was andrew in 60ad (the andrew cross). the tradition is that andrew was bound, not nailed, to a decussate cross in order to prolong his sufferings; he was an old man and might have died too quickly if a square cross was used, so denying the crowd a show and with insufficient deterrent effect.
crucufixion was a slow ignominious death, not least because vital organs remained undamaged.
a case in point was andrew in 60ad (the andrew cross). the tradition is that andrew was bound, not nailed, to a decussate cross in order to prolong his sufferings; he was an old man and might have died too quickly if a square cross was used, so denying the crowd a show and with insufficient deterrent effect.
crucufixion was a slow ignominious death, not least because vital organs remained undamaged.